Some Indicators for the Analysis of Interculturality in Italy

  • Gabriella D'Ambrosio Sapienza, University of Rome
  • Veronica Pastori National Institute for the Evaluation of the Education System

Abstract

The goal of this study is the analysis, through secondary data deriving from the main national sources, of migration’s phenomenon in Italy from 2007 to 2014. In particular, the purpose of paper is the description of interculturality focusing the attention on four specific dimensions of the daily life, like citizenship, education, labour market and marriage. Each of these offers a set of statistical indicators useful to observe the integration of migrants in Italy.

So, from this research, it will emerge actual role of Italy in European migration context with the hope that a real politic of inclusion, based on dialogue and interaction among autochthonous and foreigners, will be raise in our country where the foreign presence, in the time span of seven years, is increased by 67.5%. For this reason, the recognition of each individual, independently by national membership, is a fundamental element for builing a global community.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Ambrosini, M. (2005). Sociologia delle migrazioni. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Aptekar, S. (2015). The road to citizenship. What naturalization means for immigrants and the United States. New Brunswick-New Jersey-London: Rutgers University Press.

Bartholini, I. (2008). Uno e nessuno. L’identità negata nella società globale. Milan: FrancoAngeli.

Bauman, Z. (2007). Modus vivendi. Inferno e utopia del mondo liquido. Rome-Bari: Laterza.

Codrington, S. (2005). Planet geography. Sydney: Solid Star Press.

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Harman, L.D. (1988). The Modern Strainge: on Language and Membership. Berlin-New York- Amsterdam: Muton de Gruyter.

National Institute for Statistics. (2011). Italia in 150 anni. Sommario statistiche storiche. 1861-2010. Rome: National Institute for Statistics.

Kant, I. (1788). Kritik der praktischen Vernunft.

Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1958). Evidence and Inference in Social Research. Daedalus, 87, 4, 99-130.

Lewis-Beck, M.S., Bryman, A., & Liao, T.F. (2004). The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Marsella, A.J., & Ring, E. (2003). Human Migration and Immigration: An Overview. In L.L. Adler & U.P. Gielen (Eds.), Migration. Immigration and Emigration in International Perspective (pp. 3-22). Westport-London: Praeger.

Menard, S. (2002). Longitudinal Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Merton, R.K. (1941). Intermarriage and the social structure: fact and theory. Psychiatry. 4, 3, 361-374.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Is Migration really Increasing?. Retreived 28 May 2017, from http://www.oecd.org/berlin/Is-migration-really-increasing.pdf.

Palanca, V. (1999). Guida al pianeta dell’immigrazione. Rome: Editori riuniti.

Parati, G. (2005). Migration Italy. The Art of Talking Back in a Destination Country. Toronto-Buffalo-London: University of Toronto Press.

Riccio, S. (2000). The Italian Construction of Immigration: Sedentarist and Corporatist Narratives Facing Transnational Migration in Emilia-Romagna. In I.M. Greverus & R. Römhild (eds.), The Mediterraneans Transborder Movements and Diasporas (pp. 53-74). Münster-Hamburg-Berlin-London: LIT Verlag.

Suárez-Orozco, C. & Suárez-Orozco, M. (2001). Children of Immigration. London: Harvard University Press.

Walsh, C. (2002). Interculturalidad, reformas constitucionales y pluralismo jurídico. In J. Salgado (ed.), Justicia Indigena: Aportes para un debate (pp. 23-36). Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala and Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar.

Zanfrini, L. (2007). Cittadinanze: appartenenza e diritti nella società dell’immigrazione. Rome-Bari: Laterza.

Pubblicato
2018-06-20