Do Gun Policies Really Protect Women? A Cross-national Test of the Relationship between Gun Regulations and Female Homicide Victimization
Abstract
Globally, firearms are the most frequent means of committing homicide with young males most likely to be victimized with guns. However, within the context of intimate partner violence and family violence, females’ risk of lethal gun violence rises significantly, supporting the need to pay more attention to firearms to reduce lethal VAW. One way to protect women from firearm violence within the private sphere is to regulate access to guns based on the risk of family violence. This study examines the extent to which gun availability and gun regulations affect lethal violence against women in a relatively large sample of countries, controlling for established structural predictors of macro-level homicide rates. We find that the civilian gun ownership rate is positively related to lethal VAW. However, background checks do not have a direct effect on female homicide rates, although domestic violence background checks are significant under certain conditions.
Riferimenti bibliografici
References
Altheimer, I., & Boswell, M. (2012). Reassessing the association between gun availability and homicide at the cross-national level. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(4), 682–704.
Bridges, F. S., Tatum, K. M., & Kunselman, J. C. (2008). Domestic violence statutes and rates of intimate partner and family homicide: A research note. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19(1), 117–130.
Cao, L., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Governance and regional variation of homicide rates: Evidence from cross-national data. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(1), 25–45.
Chon, D. S. (2013). A spurious relationship of gender equality with female homicide victimization: A cross-national analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 0011128713492497.
Corradi, C., & Stöckl, H. (2014). Intimate partner homicide in 10 European countries: Statistical data and policy development in a cross-national perspective. European Journal of Criminology, 5, 601–618.
Cutright, P., & Briggs, C. M. (1995). Structural and cultural determinants of adult homicide in developed countries: Age and gender-specific rates, 1955–1989. Sociological Focus, 28(3), 221–243.
Durkheim, E. (1951 [1897]). Suicide. Free Press.
Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., & Loaza, N. (2002). Crime and violence in Latin America. In D. Levinson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment (pp. 1001–1008). Sage Publications.
Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., & Loaza, N. (2002). What causes violent crime? European Economic Review, 46(7), 1323–1357.
Fulu, E., & Miedema, S. (2015). Violence against women: Globalizing the integrated ecological model. Violence Against Women, 21(12), 1431–1455.
García-Moreno, C., Pallitto, C., Devries, K., Stöckl, H., Watts, C., & Abrahams, N. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization.
Gartner, R. (1990). The victims of homicide: A temporal and cross-national comparison. American Sociological Review, 55(1), 92–106.
Gartner, R., Baker, K., & Pampel, F. C. (1990). Gender stratification and the gender gap in homicide victimization. Social Problems, 37(4), 593–612.
Global study on homicide. (2019). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/global-study-on-homicide.html
Goodyear, A., Rodriguez, M., & Glik, D. (2019). The role of firearms in intimate partner violence: Policy and research considerations. Journal of Public Health Policy. Gordon, R. A. (2015). Regression analysis for the social sciences. Routledge.
GunPolicy.org. (2019). Sydney School of Public Health. The University of Sydney. https://www.gunpolicy.org/
Heise, L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4(3), 262–290.
Heise, L. (2011). What Works to Prevent Partner Violence? An Evidence Overview [Working Paper]. STRIVE Research Consortium. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/21062.
Heise, L. L., & Kotsadam, A. (2015). Cross-national and multilevel correlates of partner violence: An analysis of data from population-based surveys. The Lancet Global Health, 3(6), e332–e340.
Hemenway, D., & Miller, and M. (2000). Firearm availability and homicide rates across 26 high-income countries: The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 49(6), 985–988.
Hemenway, D., Shinoda-Tagawa, T., & Miller, M. (2002). Firearm availability and female homicide victimization rates among 25 populous high-income countries. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 57(2), 100–104.
Hoskin, A. W. (2001). Armed Americans: The impact of firearm availability on national homicide rates. Justice Quarterly, 18(3), 569–592.
Killias, M. (1993). International correlations between gun ownership and rates of homicide and suicide. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal, 148(10), 1721–1725.
Killias, M., van Kesteren J., & Rindlisbacher, M. (2001). Guns, violent crime, and suicide in 21 countries. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43, 429.
Long, S. J. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publications.
MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.
McPhedran, S. (2018). An evaluation of the impacts of changing firearms legislation on Australian female firearm homicide victimization rates. Violence Against Women, 24(7), 798–815.
McPhedran, S., & Mauser, G. (2013). Lethal firearm-related violence against Canadian women: Did tightening gun laws have an impact on women’s health and safety? Violence and Victims, 28(5), 875–883.
Matias, A., Gonçalves, M., Soeiro, C., & Matos, M. (2020). Intimate partner homicide: A meta-analysis of risk factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 50, 101358.
Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.
Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. R. (2007). Crime and the American Dream (5th ed.). Wadsworth.
Moghadam, V. M. (2016). Engendering development: The evolution of a field of research. In G. Hooks (Ed.), The sociology of development handbook (pp. 21–47). University of California Press.
Nivette, A. (2011). Cross-national predictors of crime: A Meta-analysis. Homicide Studies, 15(2), 103–131.
Pridemore, W. A., & Trent, C. L. S. (2010). Do the Invariant Findings of Land, McCall, and Cohen Generalize to Cross-National Studies of Social Structure and Homicide? Homicide Studies, 14(3), 296–335.
Renzetti, C. M. (2013). Feminist Criminology. Routledge.
Russell, D. E. H. (2003 [1984]). The Politics of Rape: The Victim’s Perspective. iUniverse.
Sivaraman, J. J., Ranapurwala, S. I., Moracco, K. E., & Marshall, S. W. (2019). Association of State Firearm Legislation With Female Intimate Partner Homicide. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 56(1), 125–133.
Stamatel, J. P. (2006). Incorporating socio-historical context into quantitative cross-national criminology. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 30(2), 177–207.
Stamatel, J. P. (2014). Explaining variations in female homicide victimization rates across Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 11(5), 578–600.
Stamatel, J. P. (2015). Democratic cultural values as predictors of cross-national homicide variation in Europe. Homicide Studies, 20(3), 239–256.
Stamatel, J. P. (2016a). The effects of detrimental drinking patterns and drug use on female homicide victimization rates across Europe. Current Sociology, 64(7), 1090–1107.
Stamatel, Janet P. (2016b). Money matters: Dissecting the relationship between gender equality and female homicide victimization rates in the European Union. Feminist Criminology.
Stevens, B. R., Smith, T. R., Fein, K. R., Gottschalk, M., & Howard, G. J. (2011) .A deadly mix? An international investigation of handgun availability, drinking culture, and homicide. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 35(1), 39–51.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2019a). Gender Development Index (GDI). Human Development Reports. http://hdr.undp.org/en/ content/gender-development-index-gdi
United Nations Development Programme. (2019b). Gender Inequality Index (GII). Human Development Reports. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index-gii
vanKesteren, J. N. (2014). Revisiting the gun ownership and violence link: A multilevel analysis of victimization survey data. British Journal of Criminology, 54(1), 53–72.
Vigdor, E. R., & Mercy, J. A. (2006). Do laws restricting access to firearms by domestic violence offenders prevent intimate partner homicide? Evaluation Review, 30(3), 313–346.
Whaley, R. B. (2001). The paradoxical relationship between gender inequality and rape: Toward a refined theory. Gender & Society, 15(4), 531–555.
World Bank Group. (2019) World Development Indicators. https://databank. worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators.
Yodanis, C. L. (2004). Gender inequality, violence against women, and fear: A cross-national test of the feminist theory of violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(6), 655–675.
Zeoli, A.M., McCourt, A., Buggs, S., Frattaroli, S., Lilley, D., & Webster, D. W. (2018). Analysis of the strength of legal firearms restrictions for perpetrators of domestic violence and their associations with intimate partner homicide. American Journal of Epidemiology, 187(7), 1449–1455.
Zeoli, A.M., Malinski, R., & Brenner, H. (2017). The intersection of firearms and intimate partner homicide in 15 nations. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1524838017738725.
Zeoli, A. M., & Webster, D. W. (2010). Effects of domestic violence policies, alcohol taxes and police staffing levels on intimate partner homicide in large US cities. Injury Prevention, 16(2), 90–95.
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following points:
- The author(s) guarantee(s) that the article is original and that it has not previously published nor sent to other journals for consideration.
- The author(s) declare(s) that the article does not violate the copyright of third parties and assume(s) the full personal and financial responsibility for any legal action which may be brought by third parties against the ICSR Mediterranean Knowledge
- The author(s) retain(s) the rights of the article. The ICSR Mediterranean Knowledge is allowed to publish it in digital edition with licence Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) or in any other form that the publisher considers opportune. The licence allows others to share the article, provided that the authorship and the initial publication in this journal are reported.
- The author(s) can establish arrangements with non-exclusive license to distribute the published version of the article (eg. deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), indicating that it was first published in the Journal of Mediterranean Knoweldge.
- The author(s) can distribute the work online (eg. on their website) only after that it is published by the Journal of Mediterranean Knoweldge (see The Effect of Open Access).
